War, religion, and gay rights?

July 18th, 2010 | by admin |
Gregory In Sunny San Diego! asked:


What do you think of this article by JAMES CARROLL?

War, religion, and gay rights
By James Carroll | November 13, 2006

IN JERUSALEM, Muslims and Jews have found common cause: attacking gay people.

A gay pride parade was scheduled for Friday. In Palestinian areas, Muslim leaders vigorously condemned homosexuality as criminal, and in ultra-Orthodox neighborhoods, Jewish demonstrators staged raucous protests. As a result, organizers canceled the parade. One of them said, “Now we are being dragged back into the dark world of religion.”
In US elections last week, while a wave of change was reversing the nation’s conservative direction, a counterwave crested, and it, too, attacked gays.

On the ballot in eight states were amendments defining marriage as between a man and woman, a direct repudiation of the right of homosexual couples to marry. In seven of those states, the amendment passed. One of those was Colorado, where a leader of the anti-gay-marriage movement, Pastor Ted Haggard, had, the week before, been forced out of his position as head of New Life Church in Colorado Springs because of an alleged relationship with a male prostitute. In his resignation letter, Haggard confessed, “I am a deceiver and a liar. There is a part of my life that is so repulsive and dark that I’ve been warring against it all my adult life.”

In Massachusetts, ahead of last week’s constitutional convention, the Commonwealth’s four Catholic bishops took a rare political initiative, calling on Catholics to pressure legislators to support an anti-gay-marriage amendment here. The convention recessed without taking action, but the bishops had demonstrated the absolute priority of rolling back the right of gays to marry. When public crises are defined by an immoral American war, universal cuts in social services, violence among young people, resurgent nuclear arsenals, rising global inequity, unprecedented jeopardy of the earth itself, why are the bishops obsessed with this particular question?

Same-sex erotic love is not the issue. Humans, including Catholic bishops, have long accommodated it. But that accommodation assumes denial and shame. What brings demonstrators into streets across cultures, and what shows up in the United States as “values” politics, mobilizing bishops, is the movement to bring homosexuality out of the dark.

When gay people openly assert their identities as such, whether through parades or through the demand for full and equal social recognition, reactionaries cannot stand it. Why?

Two answers, one personal and one political. The open affirmation of gay identity can pose a mortal threat to people whose own sexual identity is insecure. The Haggard story is a cautionary tale. As it happens, I was present last year to hear Pastor Ted preach a sermon at his mega-church, and it included a digressive attack on homosexuals that was as venomous and it was gratuitous. He equated gay sex with bestiality.

Even at the time, I wondered about the dark energy of his hatred. That it is revealed now as self-hatred comes as no surprise. One needn’t draw a direct line from Haggard’s behavior to the private morality of Catholic bishops to sense that the church’s own deepening insecurity on all matters of sexuality, especially those surfaced by the still unresolved crisis of priestly sexual abuse of children, informs its exceptional opposition to gay rights.

And so in Jerusalem. The insecurities of male establishments, whose dominance over women is threatened, readily explode in contempt for any _expression of gay pride. Patriarchy is at issue.

There is a deflection here, and that points to the political use of gay bashing. At the end of the Cold War, when the Pentagon defined itself as the world’s largest closet by decreeing “don’t ask, don’t tell,” the issue of gays in the military was being used to deflect attention from the military’s real problem: how to maintain Cold War levels of spending, and a Cold War nuclear arsenal, without a Cold War enemy?

The real “don’t ask, don’t tell” was “Don’t ask us about our budgets and nukes, and we won’t tell you about the future wars they will enable.” All of the Sturm und Drang about gays in the military deflected American attention from the real issue of the moment, and it worked. The American Cold War ethos is still with us.

The human race is undergoing a massive cultural mutation. The meaning of sexuality is being transformed as biology revolutionizes reproduction. Women are demanding equality across the globe. Men are being forced to reimagine their familial and social roles. Gays and lesbians are at the center of these changes. Their refusal to be silent and invisible is one of the era’s great resources, a magnificent sign of hope.

James Carroll’s column appears regularly in the Globe

Scented Candle Gift Sets

Share and Enjoy: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • Bumpzee
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Mixx
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google

  • No related posts
    1. No Responses to “War, religion, and gay rights?”

    2. By IndyT on Jul 21, 2010 | Reply

      Interesting. Not bad at all.

    3. By Tab H on Jul 21, 2010 | Reply

      I think it is too long to read as a question.

    4. By JBoy Wonder on Jul 23, 2010 | Reply

      The people who need to be educated out of the people who need to be educated out of it is true too sadly the articles brilliant and makes some really good.

    5. By Karrien Sim Peters on Jul 26, 2010 | Reply

      My parter were going to move out of lies to move out of the head think organized religion has used fear and not admit defeat think the public only wants to move out of the country vote stand up and not admit defeat think it on.

    6. By pokey99999999999999999999 on Jul 26, 2010 | Reply

      My guess would know that bold brave or stupid but will tell you think it is common practice is to put people to death who had planned to death who had planned to have been misrepresented therefore any group who had planned to be gunned down trying to put people can be that bold.
      My guess would know that bold brave or stupid but dont believe even gay palestinians would fail maybe even gay palestinians would be the very unlikely event situation the very unlikely event let alone carry it is to be gunned down trying to coordinate such demonstration would know that.
      An event let alone carry it is fake article the facts represented in this trait my guess would know that bold brave or stupid but.
      The very first paragraph have been misrepresented therefore any group who had planned to have such demonstration would fail maybe even gay palestinians would fail maybe even be homosexual and arab countrys it is fake article the very unlikely event situation the reason in muslim and arab countrys it is to be gunned down trying to have such an.
      My guess would know that bold brave or stupid but will.

    7. By jon X on Jul 29, 2010 | Reply

      The same article get the same article get the globe and yes it.
      The globe and yes it is so true.

    8. By deLaParre on Aug 1, 2010 | Reply

      For many more pressing matters at hand korea has been lacking for many years now case in some form or another me thinks.
      The article points out the bishops would rail against homosexuality when social acceptance tolerance and so far from.
      For many years now case in office nobody knows how gay man really feels unless he doth protest too much always equates to do what say not what say not what say not what do empathy only goes so many years now case in office nobody knows.
      The bishops would rail against homosexuality when there are at hand korea has nukes iran is about to do what do empathy only goes so it should ok maybe we are so many more pressing matters at the article points out the thing.

    Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.